I wrote last night:

CellWell1 is Sun and inner planets which is alleged
to be 10 billion years old.

CellWell2 is the outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn and its
satellites

So I need to explain why there is more heavy water
in Comets than Earth's ocean water.

Could it be that Dirac Radioactivities creates heavy
water at the same rate whether on Earth or Jupiter
or a Comet and that only because of the age differences that such a
density of heavy water wanes
through time? If so, then heavy water is a proof of the
Sun and Earth as 10 billion years old.

So in this explanation, Dirac Radioactivities when it creates water
molecules, it forms heavy water in the proportion that we observe on
Comets. And Comets
are part of CellWell2 of a younger age than Earth as
5 billion years. So that after 5 billion years in a 10 billion years
old Earth, that the heavy water density
shrinks to what we observe on Earth.

So is there a 2 to 1 ratio deuterium density between
Earth and Comets?

--- quoting from http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/14384/p...

Earthly seawater contains 160 ppm of deuterium, an enrichment of eight
times relative to the deuterium in the solar nebula. So we would
expect the comets to
be similarly enriched, no?

No. As it happens, the water in the three bright comets-Halley,
Hyakutake and Hale-Bopp-that recently swung past the Earth averaged
about 320 ppm deuterium, an enrichment of 16 times over the deuterium
in the solar nebula, and twice that found in seawater! How do we
account for these differences?
--- end quoting that website ---

I still need to look up what the Europa deuterium density is.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

What does Deuterium have to do with getting the age of the Solar System?
Deuterium is as stable as regular Hydrogen, there's no radioactive decay
here.

        Yousuf Khan

Good question, and a complex answer. I may not have the answer tonight
but
should after some thought.

So let us picture Dirac Radioactivities as creating all matter. It
emits from the Nucleus
of the Atom Totality and we observe it as cosmic rays-- nuclei or
protons and as
cosmic gamma rays and all their descendent transmutations of
particles.

So as we have say protoEarth some 10 billion years ago as a dot-seed
and where
cosmic rays or gamma rays accumulate around this dot-seed slowly
amassing more
proton, neutrons, electrons of elements and compounds. And suppose for
5 billion years
of Earth's steady accrection of Dirac matter that the ratio of
deuterium to normal water
is 320 ppm deuterium overall average. But then for the next 5 billion
years of Dirac
accretion of matter, for some reason the differential rate of Dirac
new matter makes
the ratio of normal water with deuterium overall decrease to that of
160 ppm.

That is about the best I can do at this moment. And I am making a
longshot bet, that
the observed measure of deuterium to normal water on Europa or Io or
Pluto or
any of the bodies beyond Pluto will come in at the 320 ppm ratio. I
have searched
high and hard for information on deuterium for the gas-giant's-
satellites and there
seems to be no information on that deuterium ratio. Perhaps the
obstacle with the
outer planets and their satellites is that gaseous water is observed
but no actual
pools of water such as in a comet. I am obviously not privy to the
details of measuring
deuterium in comets versus Io or Europa or Jupiter or Saturn. My guess
is that
if it were measurable and comparable the data would say 320 ppm
matching that of
Comets.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

And so why are you changing the subject?

        Yousuf Khan