<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur</id>
  <title type="text">sci.astro.amateur Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Amateur astronomy equipment, techniques, info, etc.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.astro.amateur/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.astro.amateur feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:22:58Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.pe" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:22:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/739b33ee5d4798c4?show_docid=739b33ee5d4798c4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/739b33ee5d4798c4?show_docid=739b33ee5d4798c4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Actually not! The tangential speed of the rotating earth is latitude &lt;br&gt; and radius dependent, whereas the rotation rate of the earth about &lt;br&gt; it axis is directly observable independent of latitude and radius. &lt;br&gt; The earth rotates exactly 360° in 86,164.09+ seconds, the sidereal &lt;br&gt; day, and is directly observable from any location.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Edward Erbeck</name>
  <email>e...@crazyedoptical.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:21:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/5006f3d08607a0b8?show_docid=5006f3d08607a0b8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/5006f3d08607a0b8?show_docid=5006f3d08607a0b8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ?? A.P. 155 EDF F-7 Value ??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  John and Jerry. Thank you both for taking the time to reply. &lt;br&gt; John it&#39;s &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot; you would choose the site you did for reference &lt;br&gt; information only insofar as I&#39;m in Arizona also. &lt;br&gt; Jerry, Condition isn&#39;t an issue and as far as Certifying an A.P. Scope &lt;br&gt; goes, it&#39;s been my experience that it would be almost redundant. The almost
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:16:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/f3e8abf6e028240a?show_docid=f3e8abf6e028240a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/f3e8abf6e028240a?show_docid=f3e8abf6e028240a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Astrophotography can be done by a relative newbie. Probably not &lt;br&gt; through-the-scope, long-exposures of DSOs but certainly piggyback &lt;br&gt; telephoto or shots of the Moon and planets with a Webcam or digital &lt;br&gt; camera are feasible with relatively little investment. This might be &lt;br&gt; just the thing to spark a newbie&#39;s interest. You don&#39;t know.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:07:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bd962b3289fcde45/5ad6ed89c4576384?show_docid=5ad6ed89c4576384</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bd962b3289fcde45/5ad6ed89c4576384?show_docid=5ad6ed89c4576384"/>
  <title type="text">Deep hole spotted on moon</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Deep hole spotted on moon &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/49845/title/Deep_hole_spotted_on_moon&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; The feature may be a ‘skylight’ in an underground lava tube.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:03:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/6dd19f523fc100d9?show_docid=6dd19f523fc100d9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/6dd19f523fc100d9?show_docid=6dd19f523fc100d9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I saw others offering opinions, I thought I would add my own. &lt;br&gt; The above are opinions and first-hand experiences that the OP might &lt;br&gt; consider when choosing equipment. I would point out that lower power &lt;br&gt; doesn&#39;t always equal wider FOV, nor does a larger aperture equal more &lt;br&gt; light gathered, nor does higher mag always mean that the binos are
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dennis Woos</name>
  <email>dpw...@gmavt.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T12:40:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/d30ef4eec5448a28?show_docid=d30ef4eec5448a28</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/d30ef4eec5448a28?show_docid=d30ef4eec5448a28"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I agree about condution being a problem. Here in Vermont where it gets nice &lt;br&gt; and cold, my old Sorels were not keeping my feet warm. I tried the insulated &lt;br&gt; insoles as last winter was winding down, and they definitely helped a lot. I &lt;br&gt; might start standing on a piece of carpet or something similarly insulating,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T12:38:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/6ef58c1eb7ef5822?show_docid=6ef58c1eb7ef5822</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/6ef58c1eb7ef5822?show_docid=6ef58c1eb7ef5822"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Sky &amp; Telescope&#39;s Weekly Bulletin - November 20, 2009</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You don&#39;t know all of the circumstances of the accident. It is &lt;br&gt; against the law to drive on the wrong side of the road, but the end &lt;br&gt; results of doing so vary widely, due to many factors. &lt;br&gt; I once witnessed an accident where a car in the oncoming lane crossed &lt;br&gt; the median, clipped the car in front of me, bounced off of a car in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dennis Woos</name>
  <email>dpw...@gmavt.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T12:30:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/b181b95afb919183?show_docid=b181b95afb919183</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/b181b95afb919183?show_docid=b181b95afb919183"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I don&#39;t think it is a good idea to turn this into a discussion of the &lt;br&gt; relative merits of binos, but when did that stop us? So, I would like to &lt;br&gt; point out that I have wonderful Celestron 7x50 Ultima binos (no longer &lt;br&gt; made), and that I recommended to my brother (a noob for sure) that he get &lt;br&gt; 10x50 instead as he lives in a fairly light-polluted area. He doesn&#39;t like
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris.B</name>
  <email>chri...@nypost.dk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T12:12:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/eb2eb73553cf84c7/1940bc190daf8592?show_docid=1940bc190daf8592</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/eb2eb73553cf84c7/1940bc190daf8592?show_docid=1940bc190daf8592"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Doom-saying kooks, time to start screaming again</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  One word: Baguette. &lt;br&gt; Some more words: &lt;br&gt; Murphy&#39;s Law states that: A baguette cannot be accelerated to near the &lt;br&gt; speed of light without serious consequences to the space time &lt;br&gt; continuum. &lt;br&gt; A few more: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Trust us. We know what we are doing.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Aye-aye, Bosun! :-)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T11:50:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/99c3a54551f79db6?show_docid=99c3a54551f79db6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/99c3a54551f79db6?show_docid=99c3a54551f79db6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Much of the heat must be lost through conduction to the ground. When &lt;br&gt; walking your boots&#39; soles spend less time in contact with the ground, &lt;br&gt; and there is increased heat generation by muscles. Does sitting down &lt;br&gt; on a chair with your feet off the ground help at all? Or maybe a &lt;br&gt; small insulated platform on which to stand? Or try Toasty Feet
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T11:07:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/ed2d13feeaadd6a4/b8be6ede43a801ad?show_docid=b8be6ede43a801ad</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/ed2d13feeaadd6a4/b8be6ede43a801ad?show_docid=b8be6ede43a801ad"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Yippee!!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Tom, are you a looter or a moocher?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T11:04:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/ed2d13feeaadd6a4/e85749db7f8e47e8?show_docid=e85749db7f8e47e8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/ed2d13feeaadd6a4/e85749db7f8e47e8?show_docid=e85749db7f8e47e8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Yippee!!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ROTFL! The Democrats tend to support: &lt;br&gt; Fairness Doctrine &lt;br&gt; Gun control &lt;br&gt; Government control of business &lt;br&gt; Card check &lt;br&gt; Elimination of school vouchers &lt;br&gt; Elimination of privately-run and financed healthcare &lt;br&gt; Quotas &lt;br&gt; Increased taxes &lt;br&gt; etc. &lt;br&gt; Maybe what you meant to say was that Republicans are further to the &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; on SOCIALIST issues.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>wsnel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T10:30:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/7ef15f80ac7666e5?show_docid=7ef15f80ac7666e5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/7ef15f80ac7666e5?show_docid=7ef15f80ac7666e5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Nov 20, 8:48 pm, &amp;quot;Howard Lester&amp;quot; &amp;lt;howardxtles...@verizon.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; 7x35 binoculars with a wide field of view can be useful for finding &lt;br&gt; and identifying star patterns and asterisms from light-polluted &lt;br&gt; areas. 10x50s are a good all-around size and magnification. &lt;br&gt; Binoculars larger than that tend to be expensive and difficult to use
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>oriel36</name>
  <email>kelleher.ger...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T07:38:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/6362d10e30c7e908?show_docid=6362d10e30c7e908</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/6362d10e30c7e908?show_docid=6362d10e30c7e908"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Astronomers would be expected to know the cause and effect of twilight &lt;br&gt; variations for different latitudes as the quicker the transit through &lt;br&gt; the circle of illumination,the more rapid the transition from daylight &lt;br&gt; into darkness with equatorial regions seeing the most pronounced &lt;br&gt; effect and this means knowing the rotational speeds which reflect
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris L Peterson</name>
  <email>c...@alumni.caltech.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T06:59:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/dd4924059f480780?show_docid=dd4924059f480780</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/dd4924059f480780?show_docid=dd4924059f480780"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:43:28 -0500, &amp;quot;John Nichols&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; No doubt there are very good, fairly obscure boots out there. For &lt;br&gt; something pretty readily available, Sorels are a good choice. You can &lt;br&gt; fortify them with chemical toe warmers, or electrically heated insoles &lt;br&gt; (you plug them in to heat, and they hold the warmth for 4-6 hours). You
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Nichols</name>
  <email>be...@worldnet.att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T05:43:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b72aab933bb75e32?show_docid=b72aab933bb75e32</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b72aab933bb75e32?show_docid=b72aab933bb75e32"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I figured you were kidding, but I wanted to be sure. It&#39;s been a long day &lt;br&gt; and I&#39;m tired. :) &lt;br&gt; Anyways, -40 would be good enough then? Any particular brand?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Angelo Campanella</name>
  <email>a.campane...@att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T05:29:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/243fcc243bdea909/e236267afb802de3?show_docid=e236267afb802de3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/243fcc243bdea909/e236267afb802de3?show_docid=e236267afb802de3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Rather than a cavity, the region is one of zero gravity! &lt;br&gt; The pressure assures that nucleii are closest to one anotther there. Fusion &lt;br&gt; could be self-regulating... If it gets too hot, the core expands, moderation &lt;br&gt; occurs and the fusion slows, etc. No thermostat required. &lt;br&gt; The vacuum concept is the one that does not occur, per se. In its place is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris L Peterson</name>
  <email>c...@alumni.caltech.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T05:18:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/9930f7689f7b0d15?show_docid=9930f7689f7b0d15</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/9930f7689f7b0d15?show_docid=9930f7689f7b0d15"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:11:58 -0500, &amp;quot;John Nichols&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I know, just kidding. Cold weather ratings are a bit of a scam; usually, &lt;br&gt; the rated temperature means the temperature at which you&#39;ll be utterly &lt;br&gt; miserable, but won&#39;t suffer permanent damage. If you want to actually be &lt;br&gt; comfortable, it&#39;s necessary to go for something designed for _much_
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jerry warner</name>
  <email>jwar...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T04:47:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/38c8b7c12d00d818?show_docid=38c8b7c12d00d818</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/38c8b7c12d00d818?show_docid=38c8b7c12d00d818"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Do they make cat &#39;booties&#39;? I need six sets. &lt;br&gt; Come spring I need forty sets.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jerry warner</name>
  <email>jwar...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T04:45:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/366a84aeb8b6f32a?show_docid=366a84aeb8b6f32a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/366a84aeb8b6f32a?show_docid=366a84aeb8b6f32a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ?? A.P. 155 EDF F-7 Value ??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would take bids on it and decide. You probably have a &lt;br&gt; valuable instrument if its in excellent condition. It might &lt;br&gt; not hurt to have someone of merit examine the scope &lt;br&gt; and issue a certificate of quality. If the certificate is good &lt;br&gt; the scope will fetch a premium easily worth the trouble &lt;br&gt; getting the certificate and any serious buyer would be
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Davoud</name>
  <email>s...@sky.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T04:22:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b437d8394bdbeea2?show_docid=b437d8394bdbeea2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b437d8394bdbeea2?show_docid=b437d8394bdbeea2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m a bit pessimistic about cold-weather boots for astronomers. My &lt;br&gt; experience is that the warmest boots made are intended to be worn by &lt;br&gt; people who are moving around. A friend of mine who spent three winters &lt;br&gt; in Antarctica said he was amazed at how warm those white boots they &lt;br&gt; issue were in _extreme_ cold. If he stopped working or stopped walking
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Nichols</name>
  <email>be...@worldnet.att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T04:11:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/29145c9e611f44e5?show_docid=29145c9e611f44e5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/29145c9e611f44e5?show_docid=29145c9e611f44e5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In Cleveland in frequently gets into the low teens and lower during winter, &lt;br&gt; and if I go to our club&#39;s dark sky site I&#39;ll for darn sure be observing on &lt;br&gt; snow, both of which are the criteria for the -100 boots. &lt;br&gt; On a personal note, I have Reynaud&#39;s syndrome, which means that when I get &lt;br&gt; cold it burns and itches like hell, so I&#39;m trying to prevent this, even if
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>palsing</name>
  <email>pnals...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T03:15:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/3ae29581ecd87a19?show_docid=3ae29581ecd87a19</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/3ae29581ecd87a19?show_docid=3ae29581ecd87a19"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cabelas.com/pac-boots.shtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; has many boots rated at -100 or &lt;br&gt; even -150... &lt;br&gt; I personally have Sorels, rated to -85, and my feet never get cold, &lt;br&gt; although the coldest I have ever experiences was +8 degrees F. I &lt;br&gt; bought them 3 sizes too big and wear multiple pairs of heavy wool &lt;br&gt; socks. &lt;br&gt; \Paul
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T02:31:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d55305266768b743?show_docid=d55305266768b743</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d55305266768b743?show_docid=d55305266768b743"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Now, Jerald, why should I give a rat&#39;s ass about the tangential &lt;br&gt; speed of the earth&#39;s equator when it is so easy to observe the &lt;br&gt; rotation of the earth with respect to a star on a local meridian? &lt;br&gt; None of the speed stuff has anything to do with the fact that the &lt;br&gt; earth rotates exactly 360° in 86,164.09+ seconds, the sidereal day.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris L Peterson</name>
  <email>c...@alumni.caltech.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T02:27:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/1c5e9e926b0948bf?show_docid=1c5e9e926b0948bf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/1c5e9e926b0948bf?show_docid=1c5e9e926b0948bf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:39:50 -0500, &amp;quot;John Nichols&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; You observe when it&#39;s -100°F? Wow! &amp;lt;g&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; ______________________________ ___________________ &lt;br&gt; Chris L Peterson &lt;br&gt; Cloudbait Observatory &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cloudbait.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T02:20:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/de8cff40f50c0cf1?show_docid=de8cff40f50c0cf1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/de8cff40f50c0cf1?show_docid=de8cff40f50c0cf1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  That was good!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Howard Lester</name>
  <email>howardxtles...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T01:48:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/927f65270d6ebc87?show_docid=927f65270d6ebc87</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/927f65270d6ebc87?show_docid=927f65270d6ebc87"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Bob Lablaw&amp;quot; wrote &lt;br&gt; Read this: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.garyseronik.com/?q=node/16&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; The gist of Alan Adler&#39;s article (for choosing binoculars for astronomy) is &lt;br&gt; a points formula where you take the square root of the aperture and &lt;br&gt; multiplying it by the magnification. 8 x 42 scores 51.8, and 7 x 50 scores &lt;br&gt; 49.5. Since they&#39;re about equally effective for stargazing, I&#39;ll take the 8
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Nichols</name>
  <email>be...@worldnet.att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T01:39:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b83642a761ab7c63?show_docid=b83642a761ab7c63</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/3c0fbc9eea10b8b0/b83642a761ab7c63?show_docid=b83642a761ab7c63"/>
  <title type="text">Pac boots</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Where can I find Pac boots that are rated to -100 degrees F? My wife has &lt;br&gt; been doing a lot of searching but hasn&#39;t had any luck. We&#39;re basing this on &lt;br&gt; the recommendation The Ironman&#39;s Tips for Staying Comfortable While &lt;br&gt; Observing in Cold Weather, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.novac.com/resources/winter.php&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Thanks!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris L Peterson</name>
  <email>c...@alumni.caltech.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T01:37:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/4f67adb48ebced21?show_docid=4f67adb48ebced21</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/4f67adb48ebced21?show_docid=4f67adb48ebced21"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Sky &amp; Telescope&#39;s Weekly Bulletin - November 20, 2009</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:25:39 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc &amp;lt;jsav...@ecn.ab.ca&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Prison is no place for the negligent. There are better punishments, &lt;br&gt; which don&#39;t result in a person becoming a permanent burden on society. &lt;br&gt; Prison should be reserved only for those guilty of violent, premeditated &lt;br&gt; crimes. &lt;br&gt; ______________________________ ___________________
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Quadibloc</name>
  <email>jsav...@ecn.ab.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T01:25:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/59deba91195e2796?show_docid=59deba91195e2796</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/59deba91195e2796?show_docid=59deba91195e2796"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Sky &amp; Telescope&#39;s Weekly Bulletin - November 20, 2009</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Astoundingly, the charge laid against the driver of the other vehicle, &lt;br&gt; criminally negligent homicide, only carries a maximum penalty of two &lt;br&gt; years in jail, instead of life imprisonment in that state. It&#39;s time &lt;br&gt; to change the laws to send a stronger message to careless drivers; &lt;br&gt; whatever you do that costs a life that you should not have done is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Get lost</name>
  <email>rander3...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T01:09:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/eb2eb73553cf84c7/9d2a4913bd62903d?show_docid=9d2a4913bd62903d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/eb2eb73553cf84c7/9d2a4913bd62903d?show_docid=9d2a4913bd62903d"/>
  <title type="text">Doom-saying kooks, time to start screaming again</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Restart for &#39;Big Bang&#39; experiment &lt;br&gt; By Paul Rincon &lt;br&gt; Science reporter, BBC News &lt;br&gt; The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiment has been re-started after a &lt;br&gt; hiatus of 14 months. &lt;br&gt; Engineers have now made two stable proton beams circulate in opposite &lt;br&gt; directions around the machine. &lt;br&gt; If all continues to go well, the team might even try to increase the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Martin R. Howell</name>
  <email>ilikestarsandyoudo...@universe.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T00:40:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/0b48c073e0415fe9/f5cb3ac16f21be85?show_docid=f5cb3ac16f21be85</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/0b48c073e0415fe9/f5cb3ac16f21be85?show_docid=f5cb3ac16f21be85"/>
  <title type="text">A Tribute to Starlord</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You&#39;ll find it here: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.theastropost.com/smf/index.php?board=75.0&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chris L Peterson</name>
  <email>c...@alumni.caltech.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T00:25:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/31fab9f0338c6294?show_docid=31fab9f0338c6294</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/31fab9f0338c6294?show_docid=31fab9f0338c6294"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:19:18 GMT, Sam Wormley &amp;lt;sworml...@mchsi.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; This all brings to mind the Argument Clinic, &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Somebody&#39;s getting their money&#39;s worth, but I&#39;m not sure who. &lt;br&gt; ______________________________ ___________________ &lt;br&gt; Chris L Peterson &lt;br&gt; Cloudbait Observatory
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bob Lablaw</name>
  <email>b...@nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T00:17:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/152d8db3a14874a5?show_docid=152d8db3a14874a5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/152d8db3a14874a5?show_docid=152d8db3a14874a5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  wowee..1 x&#39;s more magnification and smaller aperture. &lt;br&gt; 7 x 50&#39;s...somethings never change.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>palsing</name>
  <email>pnals...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T23:52:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/5c8c259f74f8dbae?show_docid=5c8c259f74f8dbae</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/5c8c259f74f8dbae?show_docid=5c8c259f74f8dbae"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Oriel36) &lt;br&gt; Since he is totally unteachable, it has been a very long time...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike Collins</name>
  <email>acridiniumes...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T23:35:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d1b5a1bc5ac2619b?show_docid=d1b5a1bc5ac2619b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d1b5a1bc5ac2619b?show_docid=d1b5a1bc5ac2619b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  While you are spinning your globe take note that it&#39;s axis is tilted.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>William Hamblen</name>
  <email>william.hamb...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T23:27:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/0f9904973eb510e6?show_docid=0f9904973eb510e6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/0f9904973eb510e6?show_docid=0f9904973eb510e6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:41:54 GMT, Sam Wormley &amp;lt;sworml...@mchsi.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Fifteen degrees per hour is true only for the mean Sun. If you use &lt;br&gt; the apparent Sun, which is the one you actually see in the sky, 15 &lt;br&gt; degrees per hour is only an approximation. &lt;br&gt; Bud
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Martin R. Howell</name>
  <email>ilikestarsandyoudo...@universe.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T23:14:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/c34992de3ec671cf?show_docid=c34992de3ec671cf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/6623b5507678cb5d/c34992de3ec671cf?show_docid=c34992de3ec671cf"/>
  <title type="text">Sky &amp; Telescope&#39;s Weekly Bulletin - November 20, 2009</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  News &lt;br&gt; ============================== ========== &lt;br&gt; In Memoriam: John Gregory &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ---------- &lt;br&gt; November 19, 2009 | The world of amateur telescope making has lost a &lt;br&gt; charismatic optical engineer and innovator at age 82. One of the &amp;quot;big &lt;br&gt; guns&amp;quot; of yesteryear, John Gregory introduced the Gregory-Maksutov telescope
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>oriel36</name>
  <email>kelleher.ger...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T22:03:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d8604f22d8c9ff04?show_docid=d8604f22d8c9ff04</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d8604f22d8c9ff04?show_docid=d8604f22d8c9ff04"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The Earth&#39;s equatorial speed is 1669.8 km per hour and turns through &lt;br&gt; 40,075 km in 24 hours but the fundamentalist ideology of empiricism &lt;br&gt; cannot accept what is pretty much this point of departure for &lt;br&gt; timekeeping and planetary dynamics. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/World_globe.jpg&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ken S. Tucker</name>
  <email>dynam...@vianet.on.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T21:02:51Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/99f07f4d55691636?show_docid=99f07f4d55691636</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/99f07f4d55691636?show_docid=99f07f4d55691636"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Sam, I&#39;ve known you for 6-7 years now, I&#39;m surprised you give &lt;br&gt; Jerald the time of day. For me, the subtle differences of measuring &lt;br&gt; time is complex, in fact we are still learning, but I think Jerald is &lt;br&gt; some sort of pissed off astro flunky. He could spend 1/2 the time &lt;br&gt; learning as he does complaining. &lt;br&gt; Ken
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ken S. Tucker</name>
  <email>dynam...@vianet.on.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T20:55:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/f238049d438bdcbd?show_docid=f238049d438bdcbd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/f238049d438bdcbd?show_docid=f238049d438bdcbd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hey there post topper... &lt;br&gt; Nope, I&#39;ve got 7x50, beauts, but nearing age 60 me pupils are not &lt;br&gt; open enough, it&#39;s a standard aging thing, besides, do the math and &lt;br&gt; you&#39;ll find the weight (and steadiness) of 50&#39;s may not be worth the &lt;br&gt; slight view increment. &lt;br&gt; Might be better to go to electronic image enhancement anyway.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T20:19:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/9c44abdde3bab5d9?show_docid=9c44abdde3bab5d9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/9c44abdde3bab5d9?show_docid=9c44abdde3bab5d9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I take it you are refusing my offer share measuring the earth&#39;s &lt;br&gt; rotation time through 360° as opposed to some globe that you likely &lt;br&gt; can&#39;t even orient to the earth&#39;s rotational axis! &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll bet you are in conflict with knowledgeable people in your own &lt;br&gt; church congregation, Jerald. &lt;br&gt; It is sad that you are so utterly confused, and it irritates some
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>oriel36</name>
  <email>kelleher.ger...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T19:57:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/0bb855235339fe33?show_docid=0bb855235339fe33</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/0bb855235339fe33?show_docid=0bb855235339fe33"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  What you are looking at is a homogenised timekeeping average which &lt;br&gt; lumps the average 24 hour day together with the 365/366 day calendar &lt;br&gt; system so that when you perceive the constellations to revolve about &lt;br&gt; Polaris you are isolated as a group in fixing the daily cycle to that &lt;br&gt; apparent constellational rotation and in direct conflict with the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T19:04:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/c40ad8e0890dd897?show_docid=c40ad8e0890dd897</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/c40ad8e0890dd897?show_docid=c40ad8e0890dd897"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In science (and astronomy) the final arbiter is observation. Observation &lt;br&gt; confirms that the earth rotates exactly 360° in 86,164.09+ seconds and &lt;br&gt; the rotation rate is verified by direct observation by a star returning &lt;br&gt; to a meridian. &lt;br&gt; You cannot deny this observable fact, Gerald. &lt;br&gt; How about I fly you over here to Ames, Iowa and together will time
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>hero</name>
  <email>ecyaya...@yeah.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T19:04:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/88869647c137ce2b/902fe3fa2695d2a7?show_docid=902fe3fa2695d2a7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/88869647c137ce2b/902fe3fa2695d2a7?show_docid=902fe3fa2695d2a7"/>
  <title type="text">۞__۞__۞paypal wholesale cheap replica hangbags &amp; purse at www.ecyaya.com</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ۞__۞__۞paypal wholesale cheap replica hangbags &amp;amp; purse at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ecyaya.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; replica bag replica prada bag replica new prada bag replica claasic &lt;br&gt; prada bag replica prada handbag replica shoulder bags replica Prada &lt;br&gt; Cervo Pleat Hobo Bag on &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ecyaya.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Replica Prada Cervo Pleat Hobo Bag detail below: &lt;br&gt; The replica Prada Cervo Pleat hobo Bag is an ordinary deerskin
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Bill</name>
  <email>2k7...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T18:53:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/66639c90ed3b1c3e?show_docid=66639c90ed3b1c3e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/66639c90ed3b1c3e?show_docid=66639c90ed3b1c3e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  We&#39;ll there you went and done it... now you&#39;re hooked! &lt;br&gt; Dennis&#39; suggestions match what I would offer a new observer. &lt;br&gt; A planisphere is really just an ultra-basic sky map (cost about $10-15 &lt;br&gt; -or you can make your own) - with a neat twist that allows you to set it &lt;br&gt; to show the sky for any date and time. It&#39;s main use is just to help
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Howard Lester</name>
  <email>howardxtles...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T18:51:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/ea92443e94ad0402?show_docid=ea92443e94ad0402</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/bc91bb7d0f885477/ea92443e94ad0402?show_docid=ea92443e94ad0402"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Total noob</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Bob Lawblaw&amp;quot; wrote &lt;br&gt; When it comes to viewing stars and the rest of the night sky, 8 x 42&#39;s are &lt;br&gt; even better. The more magnification, the more stars seen, and 8 x 42&#39;s (or 8 &lt;br&gt; x 40&#39;s, whatever) are more versatile all-around instruments. 7 x50&#39;s were &lt;br&gt; the most recommended many years ago, but this is the 21st century. ;-)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Quadibloc</name>
  <email>jsav...@ecn.ab.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T18:38:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/2fd5ad174cbf8d65?show_docid=2fd5ad174cbf8d65</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/d78b0413c635575d/2fd5ad174cbf8d65?show_docid=2fd5ad174cbf8d65"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ?? A.P. 155 EDF F-7 Value ??</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I would suspect it&#39;s worth quite a bit, although I would have said the &lt;br&gt; same of a bare OTA; the accessories may be routine items that a buyer &lt;br&gt; might not necessarily be interested in, but the telescope itself... &lt;br&gt; a 6&amp;quot; apochromat? &lt;br&gt; It sold originally for $6,800, but those who bought it new had to go &lt;br&gt; on a waiting list... and a previous large apo from Astro-Physics that
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>oriel36</name>
  <email>kelleher.ger...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T18:21:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d42e4a888faf8408?show_docid=d42e4a888faf8408</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/d42e4a888faf8408?show_docid=d42e4a888faf8408"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  What exists is a small minority or rather,a cult which can argue &lt;br&gt; against the basic planetary facts of shape and rotation at a rate of &lt;br&gt; 15 degrees per hour and that cult has now reached a stage where they &lt;br&gt; have become extremely offensive with their conclusion which links &lt;br&gt; carbon dioxide directly to global temperature just as at ground zero
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Wormley</name>
  <email>sworml...@mchsi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T17:59:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/46f6348f36d540ea?show_docid=46f6348f36d540ea</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.pe/group/sci.astro.amateur/browse_frm/thread/11cc8f0209939eb7/46f6348f36d540ea?show_docid=46f6348f36d540ea"/>
  <title type="text">Re: what&#39;s your bet?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Gerald, we already know about the 24 hour solar day, the equation &lt;br&gt; of time to calculate why the solar noon is late and early, and the &lt;br&gt; Gregorian calendar with its leap years to correct for its errors. &lt;br&gt; None of that has anything has anything to do with the observable &lt;br&gt; fact that the earth rotates exactly 360° in 86,164.09+ seconds, the
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
