El grupo al cual envías entradas es un grupo Usenet. Si envías mensajes a este grupo, cualquier usuario de Internet podrá ver tu dirección de correo electrónico
Here in the midst of health care, wars, rumors of war, commies, socialists, rightwingnuts, biblethumpers, Michael Jackson's death and resurrection, it's great to see some real people doing something worthwhile!!!
Davoud wrote: > ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a > presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet > Chris!
Davoud wrote: > ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a > presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet > Chris!
In farticle <010720092040111400%s...@sky.net>, Davoud <s...@gay.nut> felched the last of shitetards freezer burned prefelched frozen gerbils:
>.. at the Midlust Astro-Buggering Conference, where Chrissy the bugger boi was a >peterpuffer and I was an erect telescope. And what a pleasure it was to have >the wanker Chrissy L Peterpuffer spit polishing my mushroom cap polish my bell end chrissy! > oooooooooohhhhh aaaaaaahhhhhhhhh >Photo of this historic star party cumshot at ><http://tinyurl.com/as5ufc>. look at my chubby telescope
>Davoud gay penis
>-- >usenut *at* davidillig tinkywinky buggercam
luv he photo boy puppy davouds gay penis boyswedding gloryhole cam sooper adventure club i was hard on good time by arwl rectal saa arsetrotard bugger twinks why am i gay i need my tard to come home come back come home to saa wagontard dennis bishop make wagontard come home and ben dover so i can feltch his pongy arsehole _________________________________________________ wagon radio flyer rosatard twonk twonk Chrissy Lou Peterpuffer wiener dog weather centre report Clodshite Obuggertory where saa buggers ben dover for uncle bob http://www.cloudshite.poofter.cam nurse my nancy ninnies suckle my shela teats please glue my prosthetic hockey puck foot back on my stub and spray paint it my babbleshite ate colostomy tube fell off buh bye tard buh bye
make shitetard come home the spammertard of rosatard buh bye wagontard make tard come home i want my tard and bobs your uncle
> People being what they are and the internet being what it is they could be > anyone.
Good point. I seriously doubt it's them, and no one has showed up to confirm it. From the images, one guy looks about 80 and the other 70, not the impression I get from their lively and sometimes controversial interactions.
AJ Sanderlin wrote: > Good point. I seriously doubt it's them, and no one has showed up to > confirm it. From the images, one guy looks about 80 and the other 70, not > the impression I get from their lively and sometimes controversial > interactions.
Thank you for your unkind words. I just turned 65. Chris is considerably younger, but I don't know his age and wouldn't reveal it if I did.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, that I am 80 years old, or perhaps 90. You must have very limited life experience if you think that such a person cannot have a "lively" interaction with the world. I would recommend a visit to the Iridium Jazz Club at Broadway & 51st, where 93-year-old Les Paul plays two sets every Monday night. I wonder how well you will be performing at 93! I'll bet that I am doing a _lot_ of things that would surprise any person with a sufficiently high level of ignorance.
This was unexpected. If you are serious in thinking that's not Chris and me, why not go to mwaic.com and look at the pictures of the presenters? You will see Chris's photo there. And then you might tell yourself that since I told the truth about that being Chris on the right, maybe I also told the truth about that being me on the left. Or you could look at Facebook or davidillig.com or the photo at the top of this page <http://www.primordial-light.com/technique.html>.
Of maybe not; they could all be hoaxes, since I am a known conspirator in the CIA/NSA/Air Force/Department of Agriculture/Nevada Highway Commission/Taft/Eisenhower/Nixon/Clinton/Bush/Obama/Leftist/Rightist/ Islamic/UN/NRA/ACLU/Liberal Press/RushLimbaugh/Illuminati/ Your-Favorite-Here coverup of the aliens that we are holding at Area 51. I may also have participated as a rock and sand painter in the Moon-landing hoax.
Maybe there was no MWAIC; if there was a meeting at all, maybe it was for the purpose of planning to move the Area 51 aliens to Guantanamo -- dressed as Arabs, of course.
Maybe that wasn't me in the story in the February, 2009, issue of MacLife. Maybe the story that my wife had published in the November, 2008, issue of Sky & Telescope wasn't about me.
In other words, the pic is what it is. It was posted for the amusement of SAA regulars who have brains in their heads, not to offer anyone the opportunity to display their lack of civility or to feed the paranoid nutsos. Come to think of it, maybe it's the paranoid nutsos who aren't real. And wouldn't that be great!
We don't do Mac/Windows talk any more, but I will comment on the Verizon MiFi device. For those not familiar with it, it accesses the Net via Verizon's 3G network and rebroadcasts it via WiFi.
Two thumbs up. I had a Verizon express card, which I liked very much, but it only serves one computer at a time, and when my wife wanted wi-fi on a trip it necessitated setting up "Internet Sharing via AirPort" on the Mac. No big thing, but when breakfasting with several friends (up to five connections at once) or on the road when my wife needs wi-fi as well, the MiFi is very convenient. I use a closed network with WPA2 encryption and a non-trivial password. Connection is instantaneous and it holds. In the photo it was tethered to the computer, but it need not be; the battery lasts for about four hours of continuous use and can go on standby after an interval of disuse.
These things are not inexpensive @ $60 per month, but when we're on the road my wife and I agree that it's worth every penny. If I recall, the wireless was more $10 or so per day at the Marriott, so there was $30 of my $60, and I saved another $40 earlier in June. In other words, the use of the MiFi was free for June and put me $10 in the black. Highly recommended for info-junkies.
Davoud
* Please would note that in the photo I had my hands on the Dell. Nice computer, nice size. Notice that Chris had his hands at his sides, perhaps unwilling to touch that other computer ;-)
> We don't do Mac/Windows talk any more, but I will comment on the > Verizon MiFi device. For those not familiar with it, it accesses the > Net via Verizon's 3G network and rebroadcasts it via WiFi.
> Two thumbs up. I had a Verizon express card, which I liked very much, > but it only serves one computer at a time, and when my wife wanted > wi-fi on a trip it necessitated setting up "Internet Sharing via > AirPort" on the Mac. No big thing, but when breakfasting with several > friends (up to five connections at once) or on the road when my wife > needs wi-fi as well, the MiFi is very convenient. I use a closed > network with WPA2 encryption and a non-trivial password. Connection is > instantaneous and it holds. In the photo it was tethered to the > computer, but it need not be; the battery lasts for about four hours of > continuous use and can go on standby after an interval of disuse.
> These things are not inexpensive @ $60 per month, but when we're on the > road my wife and I agree that it's worth every penny. If I recall, the > wireless was more $10 or so per day at the Marriott, so there was $30 > of my $60, and I saved another $40 earlier in June. In other words, the > use of the MiFi was free for June and put me $10 in the black. Highly > recommended for info-junkies.
> Davoud
> * Please would note that in the photo I had my hands on the Dell. Nice > computer, nice size. Notice that Chris had his hands at his sides, > perhaps unwilling to touch that other computer ;-)
my son has one for work(and play)...he loves it...he bought it brought it to work and showed them...now they are paying for it...they see how much more work he can get done
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:29:38 -0400, "AJ Sanderlin" <aj...@ez.net> wrote: >Good point. I seriously doubt it's them, and no one has showed up to >confirm it. From the images, one guy looks about 80 and the other 70, not >the impression I get from their lively and sometimes controversial >interactions.
I can assure you it really is us. Davoud normally looks much younger, but the strain of sitting for ten seconds in front of a Dell running Windows 7 really took its toll on him... _________________________________________________
>"Michael Toms" <t...@nospam.net> wrote in message >news:_u33m.34419$PH1.33939@edtnps82... >> People being what they are and the internet being what it is they could be >> anyone.
>Good point. I seriously doubt it's them, and no one has showed up to >confirm it. From the images, one guy looks about 80 and the other 70, not >the impression I get from their lively and sometimes controversial >interactions.
. . .and you are coming across here as around age 13 (or younger).
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:46:49 -0400, "The Slammer" <slammers...@bam.net> wrote:
>"Davoud" <s...@sky.net> wrote in message >news:010720092040111400%star@sky.net... >> ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a >> presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet >> Chris!
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:46:49 -0400, "The Slammer" <slammers...@bam.net> > wrote:
>>"Davoud" <s...@sky.net> wrote in message >>news:010720092040111400%star@sky.net... >>> ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a >>> presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet >>> Chris!
> Either one of them is smarter on their dumbest day than you will ever > be on your smartest day.
Really? Well, how about I throw a little integration/ differentiation at them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. The latter stops most folks in their tracks fast. Yes, I think it would be an interesting challenge.
Plus, each have achieved something in life.
> Have you?
And what might that be? "Davoud" spends most of his time here blasting this one or that one with his quite opinionated discussion. Hard to tell if he's achieved anything to speak of. As for Chris, I'm uncertain, although his conversations are far more factual, for the most part, than Davoud's.
The Slammer wrote: > Really? Well, how about I throw a little integration/ differentiation > at them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. The > latter stops most folks in their tracks fast. Yes, I think it would be an > interesting challenge.
Is that the limit of your definition of achievement? Rembrandt, Shakespeare, Goethe, Proust, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Salk, Eisenhower--just a bunch of slackers, eh?
> "Davoud" spends most of his time here blasting this > one or that one with his quite opinionated discussion.
Er, ah, who's doing the "blasting" here? Never mind. For $80 per hour, or fraction thereof, plus expenses, I'll come to your home and/or office and show you how to add my name to your kill-file.
> Hard to tell if he's achieved anything to speak of.
I can assure you that I have achieved very little to speak of. Bet you won't solve that riddle!
>"Martin R. Howell" <martinhow...@ilikestarsandyoudotoo.com> wrote in message >news:e1gq4596k476s9ud4qaenso9evm49kv52c@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:46:49 -0400, "The Slammer" <slammers...@bam.net> >> wrote:
>>>"Davoud" <s...@sky.net> wrote in message >>>news:010720092040111400%star@sky.net... >>>> ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a >>>> presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet >>>> Chris!
>> Either one of them is smarter on their dumbest day than you will ever >> be on your smartest day.
>Really? Well, how about I throw a little integration/ differentiation at >them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. The latter >stops most folks in their tracks fast. Yes, I think it would be an >interesting challenge.
> Plus, each have achieved something in life. >> Have you?
>And what might that be? "Davoud" spends most of his time here blasting this >one or that one with his quite opinionated discussion. Hard to tell if he's >achieved anything to speak of. As for Chris, I'm uncertain, although his >conversations are far more factual, for the most part, than Davoud's.
Your lack of knowledge of this group is more than apparent to any of the many longtime residents here. Lurk awhile before making statements which show you clearly have no handle those that post here. Oh, by the way, I am not interested in the ill informed response your will shoot back at me. so. . .PLONK
>Your lack of knowledge of this group is more than apparent to any of >the many longtime residents here. Lurk awhile before making >statements which show you clearly have no handle those that post here. >Oh, by the way, I am not interested in the ill informed response your >will shoot back at me. so. . .PLONK
should read. . ."you're going to shoot back at me" sleepy and past my bedtime when I posted the error good night
>> Really? Well, how about I throw a little integration/ differentiation >> at them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. The >> latter stops most folks in their tracks fast. Yes, I think it would be >> an >> interesting challenge.
> Is that the limit of your definition of achievement? Rembrandt, > Shakespeare, Goethe, Proust, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Salk, Eisenhower--just > a bunch of slackers, eh?
So, you're trying to compare yourself to poets, playrights and past presidents? Sorry, don't think so.
>> "Davoud" spends most of his time here blasting this >> one or that one with his quite opinionated discussion.
> Er, ah, who's doing the "blasting" here? Never mind. For $80 per hour, > or fraction thereof, plus expenses, I'll come to your home and/or > office and show you how to add my name to your kill-file.
For double that rate, I'll come to your house and teach you lessons in net etiquette.
>> Hard to tell if he's achieved anything to speak of.
> I can assure you that I have achieved very little to speak of. Bet you > won't solve that riddle!
Don't want to solve it, thanks, but if you think you've been courteous and respectful to others here, think again.
>> Good point. I seriously doubt it's them, and no one has showed up to >> confirm it. From the images, one guy looks about 80 and the other 70, >> not >> the impression I get from their lively and sometimes controversial >> interactions.
> Thank you for your unkind words. I just turned 65. Chris is > considerably younger, but I don't know his age and wouldn't reveal it > if I did.
Well, you look at least 75 in the image. The color is way off in that image and I suppose if saturation was added, you'd look more your age.
> Suppose, for the sake of argument, that I am 80 years old, or perhaps > 90. You must have very limited life experience if you think that such a > person cannot have a "lively" interaction with the world.
When I visit the elderly realm, I see two things generally: either 1) people doing very well for their age (one 85 year old I know walks 5 mi/ day) or 2) people doing poorly (the vast majority of those I see at 80+). So, my experience is not limited, but realistic.
I would
> recommend a visit to the Iridium Jazz Club at Broadway & 51st, where > 93-year-old Les Paul plays two sets every Monday night. I wonder how > well you will be performing at 93!
For every exception, we have at least four non-exceptions not doing so well. If you look hard enough, you can find exceptions to every rule.
I'll bet that I am doing a _lot_ of
> things that would surprise any person with a sufficiently high level of > ignorance.
I don't know you, so perhaps, perhaps not. Whatever you're doing would have to be compared with the majority of people at your age to find out if your activities are surprising.
> This was unexpected. If you are serious in thinking that's not Chris > and me, why not go to mwaic.com and look at the pictures of the > presenters? You will see Chris's photo there. And then you might tell > yourself that since I told the truth about that being Chris on the > right, maybe I also told the truth about that being me on the left. Or > you could look at Facebook or davidillig.com or the photo at the top of > this page <http://www.primordial-light.com/technique.html>.
Anything on the web can be faked, even to the extremes you're speaking of.
> Of maybe not; they could all be hoaxes, since I am a known conspirator > in the CIA/NSA/Air Force/Department of Agriculture/Nevada Highway > Commission/Taft/Eisenhower/Nixon/Clinton/Bush/Obama/Leftist/Rightist/ > Islamic/UN/NRA/ACLU/Liberal Press/RushLimbaugh/Illuminati/ > Your-Favorite-Here coverup of the aliens that we are holding at Area > 51. I may also have participated as a rock and sand painter in the > Moon-landing hoax.
> Maybe there was no MWAIC; if there was a meeting at all, maybe it was > for the purpose of planning to move the Area 51 aliens to Guantanamo -- > dressed as Arabs, of course.
> Maybe that wasn't me in the story in the February, 2009, issue of > MacLife. Maybe the story that my wife had published in the November, > 2008, issue of Sky & Telescope wasn't about me.
> In other words, the pic is what it is. It was posted for the amusement > of SAA regulars who have brains in their heads, not to offer anyone the > opportunity to display their lack of civility or to feed the paranoid > nutsos. Come to think of it, maybe it's the paranoid nutsos who aren't > real. And wouldn't that be great!
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:46:49 -0400, "The Slammer" <slammers...@bam.net> > > wrote:
> >>"Davoud" <s...@sky.net> wrote in message > >>news:010720092040111400%star@sky.net... > >>> ... at the Midwest Astro-Imaging Conference, where Chris was a > >>> presenter and I was a rapt listener. And what a pleasure it was to meet > >>> Chris!
> > Either one of them is smarter on their dumbest day than you will ever > > be on your smartest day.
> Really? Well, how about I throw a little integration/ differentiation at > them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. The latter > stops most folks in their tracks fast. Yes, I think it would be an > interesting challenge.
> Plus, each have achieved something in life.
> > Have you?
> And what might that be? "Davoud" spends most of his time here blasting this > one or that one with his quite opinionated discussion. Hard to tell if he's > achieved anything to speak of. As for Chris, I'm uncertain, although his > conversations are far more factual, for the most part, than Davoud's.
Hmm Integration/Differentiion is discussed in the first part of Calculus-I which is taught to most high school seniors except where "creation science" is taught. What is difficult about Calc-I??? Based on 35 years teaching and doing research at a major US university, the only people who have trouble with organic chemistry are the doctor- wanna-be's. So why do you think a ordinary educated high-school senior would have troubles when you "throw a little integration/ differentiation at them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. " Oh I get it!!! You came a creation "we call creation science because we make it up as we go" science state and you still think Algebra is hard and dinosaurs and people roamed the earth together. He Ed and Lin here is another believer
"yourmommycalled" <mommycal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:46ea7ea3-38ed-4f71-a39a-
"Hmm Integration/Differentiion is discussed in the first part of Calculus-I which is taught to most high school seniors except where "creation science" is taught...."
True for the first part of your statement, however the subject is NOT taught to MOST high school seniors, only a very few. Also, I don't know where you get the "creation science" term and what relevance that has to whether or not the teaching of Calculus occurs.
"What is difficult about Calc-I??? Based on 35 years teaching and doing research at a major US university, the only people who have trouble with organic chemistry are the doctor- wanna-be's.... "
Again, I don't know where you get this.... opinion... as this is your opinion. Doctors as well as anyone else can run into problems with organic chemistry. Depends a LOT on where you take it, who teaches it, and what text is used.
"So why do you think a ordinary educated high-school senior would have troubles when you "throw a little integration/ differentiation at them and see how they do, or some organic/inorganic chemistry. "......."
Well, for one, Calculus in high school mostly does *not* apply to an "ordinary" high school senior. In fact, a lot of college prep students don't take it either while in high school. My response wasn't to them directly, but in response to the challenge someone made to me regarding them. However, indirectly my response was to them also.
"Oh I get it!!! You came a creation "we call creation science because we make it up as we go" science state and you still think Algebra is hard and dinosaurs and people roamed the earth together. He Ed and Lin here is another believer"
Interesting how you keep redirecting your answers to "creation" issues, apparently something you're not comfortable with yourself. BTW, even if a science is taught in a "creation" environment, that doesn't mean it isn't taught properly by any stretch of the imagination. Ever read "Advanced Chemisty In Creation"? Also, matter of factly, algebra can be difficult at first until it is understood, and I won't touch the dinosaurs/people issue as that is something best left to another group. I have not stated my opinion one way or the other here, so no relevance to these "Ed" or "Lin" individuals.
Most of what you wrote was irrelevant and failed to address the scope of the previous discussion/ responses.
> Davoud wrote: > These things are not inexpensive @ $60 per month, but when we're on the > road my wife and I agree that it's worth every penny. If I recall, the > wireless was more $10 or so per day at the Marriott, so there was $30 > of my $60, and I saved another $40 earlier in June.
Marriott hasn't charged for in room WiFi since 2004 and started offering free WiFi in its lobby in 2007. Even budget and cheapo hotels and motels offer free WiFi these days.
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:47:43 GMT, "Rick" <r...@nospammers.not> wrote: > Marriott hasn't charged for in room WiFi since 2004 and started offering > free WiFi in its lobby in 2007. Even budget and cheapo hotels and motels > offer free WiFi these days.
The Marriott in Hoffman Estates, where most of the MWAIC attendees stayed, charges $9.95 per day for WiFi access. _________________________________________________
|
