El grupo al cual envías entradas es un grupo Usenet. Si envías mensajes a este grupo, cualquier usuario de Internet podrá ver tu dirección de correo electrónico
On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > his dolphin as we speak.
> Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > be a perfect kookstorm.
2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
RT PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > his dolphin as we speak.
> Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > be a perfect kookstorm.
2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I remember one idiot telling me that I wouldn't be able to make a cup of coffee after12-31-99.
I asked why, and he said that the timer on my coffeee maker would not be able to read the date 1-1-2000.
I told him that my coffee maker had no clock.
Quit your complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LOL. I usually do go with other (male) friends to the movies. My current gf doesn't like the good kind of movies that I do. Besides, we usually sneak into a 2nd movie and she's got some sort of 'morals'.
help stimulate the economy and be entertained.... RT PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your homoerotic fantasies notwithstanding, I think I'll pass on 2012. Even tho it looks to have great special effects.
> On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> > If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > > his dolphin as we speak.
> > Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > > be a perfect kookstorm.
> 2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your > complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, > help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
> RT > PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 was entertaining. He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his approved debauchery is actually rather extensive.
> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > his dolphin as we speak.
> Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > be a perfect kookstorm.
2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
RT PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
********************************** Barbara must be on the rag again ... you really should let go of your faggodocious aspirations, you're a married man ... unless Barbara is a guy ... or owns a strap-on, to stir your fantasies ... through the back door, that is ...
On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
I'll wait until I can see it on the net....
I'd like to see a film about how Cain was sent into the Israeli wilderness, to interbreed with the Neanderthals.
> If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > his dolphin as we speak.
I don't hear anything....
> Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > be a perfect kookstorm.
2012 how the hell did the ancients know about it.... NASA denies and debunks everything about it. They claim there is no planetary alignment. And the Mayan Calendar didn't end on that date.
I guess we have to wait and see.... In the meantime....
"Man will see weather and earthquakes as he has never seen before." (HaShem)
And we are seeing it setting records every year. Could be caused by a non existent 10th planet that doesn't take its rightful place in a nonexistent planetary alignment. In an imaginary, every 26,000 year.,,approach....
HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 was entertaining. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No. That's what I call a 'good start'.
He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his approved debauchery is actually rather extensive. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You have NO idea what kind of debauchery *I* am capable of.
PS- Hey Bradley... Exactly what religion are YOU ?
> On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> > If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > > his dolphin as we speak.
> > Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > > be a perfect kookstorm.
> 2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your > complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, > help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
> RT > PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 was entertaining. He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his approved debauchery is actually rather extensive.
~ BG ************************************ Say, GuthBall, rumor has it that you can solve a 1 X 1 X 1 Rubik's Cube in under 30 minutes .... yer fucking brilliant, dude .....
> > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> > If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > > his dolphin as we speak.
> > Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > > be a perfect kookstorm.
> 2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your > complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, > help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
> RT > PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
> ********************************** > Barbara must be on the rag again ... you really should let go of your > faggodocious aspirations, you're a married man ... unless Barbara > is a guy ... or owns a strap-on, to stir your fantasies ... through the > back door, that is ...
Hagar you're slipping. You can be more creative than that... Just one star for you.
RT PS Only strap on I own is a 9mm.. PPS I noticed and so did everyone else that you stopped praising Palin after I posted her exorcism... Bawhahahahaha..
<01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their >> pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
>I'll wait until I can see it on the net....
>I'd like to see a film about how Cain was sent into the >Israeli wilderness, to interbreed with the Neanderthals.
>> If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging >> his dolphin as we speak.
>I don't hear anything....
>> Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could >> be a perfect kookstorm.
>2012 how the hell did the ancients know about it.... >NASA denies and debunks everything about it. They >claim there is no planetary alignment. And the Mayan >Calendar didn't end on that date.
>I guess we have to wait and see.... >In the meantime....
>"Man will see weather and earthquakes as he has never >seen before." (HaShem)
>And we are seeing it setting records every year. Could >be caused by a non existent 10th planet that doesn't take >its rightful place in a nonexistent planetary alignment. >In an imaginary, every 26,000 year.,,approach....
>HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 >was entertaining. >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>No. That's what I call a 'good start'.
>He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican >(cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his >approved debauchery is actually rather extensive. >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>You have NO idea what kind of debauchery *I* >am capable of.
>PS- Hey Bradley... Exactly what religion are YOU ?
> > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> > If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > > his dolphin as we speak.
> > Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > > be a perfect kookstorm.
> 2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your > complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, > help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
> RT > PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
> ********************************** > Barbara must be on the rag again ... you really should let go of your > faggodocious aspirations, you're a married man ... unless Barbara > is a guy ... or owns a strap-on, to stir your fantasies ... through the > back door, that is ...
Hagar you're slipping. You can be more creative than that... Just one star for you.
RT PS Only strap on I own is a 9mm.. PPS I noticed and so did everyone else that you stopped praising Palin after I posted her exorcism... Bawhahahahaha..
*********************************** Believe it or not ... I do have more important things to do than playing tit-for-tat with a bunch of Liberal doofuses. PS: Palin will be the Liberal's worst nightmare ... mark my words. The more you losers try to disparage her, the more her popularity increases. You tards never learn, do you now ...
> HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 > was entertaining. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> No. That's what I call a 'good start'.
> He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican > (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his > approved debauchery is actually rather extensive. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> You have NO idea what kind of debauchery *I* > am capable of.
> PS- Hey Bradley... Exactly what religion are YOU ?
> Hint: KOOK is not a religion.
Inactive Mennonite. We like to accomplish practical stuff that's good for the environment and otherwise good for the soul. I think being a Cathar would have been even better, though obviously the Pope would not have thought so.
> > On Nov 19, 6:10 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > > > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> > > If you listen hard, you can hear Sir Arthur flogging > > > his dolphin as we speak.
> > > Since '2012' is already at the movies, this could > > > be a perfect kookstorm.
> > 2012 will be a cash cow for many Doomsayers just like Y2K. Quit your > > complaining. Go with the flow. Take your boy friend to the movies, > > help stimulate the economy and be entertained....
> > RT > > PS Remember, I said stimulate the economy not his DICK!
> HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into work camps and 9/11 > was entertaining. He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican > (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. The list of his > approved debauchery is actually rather extensive.
> ~ BG > ************************************ > Say, GuthBall, rumor has it that you can solve a 1 X 1 X 1 Rubik's > Cube in under 30 minutes .... yer fucking brilliant, dude .....
> HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into > work camps and 9/11 was entertaining. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> No. That's what I call a 'good start'.
> He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican > (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. > The list of his approved debauchery is actually > rather extensive. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> You have NO idea what kind of debauchery *I* > am capable of.
Well.....you can't say you haven't given us a Clue in the preview of your !!Shocking!! 'Bear Necessities', or is that 'Bare Necessities' amongst so many others. Too !!Shocking!! to warrant a second glance.
> PS- Hey Bradley... Exactly what religion are YOU ?
>> HVAC thinks putting Christ on a stick, Jews into >> work camps and 9/11 was entertaining. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> No. That's what I call a 'good start'.
>> He thinks anything nasty and kosher republican >> (cloaked as an Atheist democrat) is fun stuff. >> The list of his approved debauchery is actually >> rather extensive. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> You have NO idea what kind of debauchery *I* >> am capable of.
> Well.....you can't say you haven't given us a Clue in > the preview of your !!Shocking!! 'Bear Necessities', > or is that 'Bare Necessities' amongst so many others. > Too !!Shocking!! to warrant a second glance.
>> PS- Hey Bradley... Exactly what religion are YOU ?
>> Hint: KOOK is not a religion.
> In your KOOKOO CASE it most certainly is, HVAC.
> 'It's a Jungle of Debauchary out there of....'
> *Hallelujah*
> *Amen*
PS *I* wonder what happened to the Debauched Dr P? Perhaps his 'Debauchary' finally got to him?
HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their > pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
I'm not disputing you, merely noting the apparent irony in the fact that there are few (if any) reasonable people who do NOT believe that there is intelligent life on other planets. They just don't believe that they can nor would come here in order to probe the anus of some redneck.
>> ALL the fucking ufo geeks will be wetting their >> pants when the movie 'The 4th Kind' comes out.
> I'm not disputing you, merely noting the apparent > irony in the fact that there are few (if any) reasonable > people who do NOT believe that there is intelligent > life on other planets. They just don't believe that they > can nor would come here in order to probe the anus > of some redneck.
I've given many reasons why we are alone...At least in our galaxy at the current time.
Why would I believe something for which there is no proof? And for every reason you can give why there SHOULD be intelligent life in our galaxy, I can give you TWO reasons that show that there isn't.
To me, this belief in alien civilizations is hardly more that a religion.
"HVAC" <harlowcampb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why would I believe something for which there is > no proof?
Oh, please. You accept plenty of things without "Proof."
Very few people -- an insignificant percentage -- have ever seen "Proof" that their parents are really their biological parents, or that their siblings are actual blood relatives...
What I hope you mean (for the sake of accuracy) is "Evidence," though that too isn't technically correct.
There is evidence, even if it isn't very good evidence.
What's the "Best" evidence for intelligent life in the galaxy? Well, we only have one model to go by -- the Earth -- and that one model is teaming with life.
Sorry, but when your only model points not only to life but to intelligent life, that is "Evidence" for life... even if you want to call it weak evidence.
> And for every reason you can give why > there SHOULD be intelligent life in our galaxy, I > can give you TWO reasons that show that there isn't.
Fine. Let's see your two reasons.
> To me, this belief in alien civilizations is hardly > more that a religion.
Change that to "Alien visitors" and I'd agree with you.
> "HVAC" <harlowcampb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why would I believe something for which there is > > no proof?
> Oh, please. You accept plenty of things without "Proof."
> Very few people -- an insignificant percentage -- have > ever seen "Proof" that their parents are really their > biological parents, or that their siblings are actual > blood relatives...
> What I hope you mean (for the sake of accuracy) is > "Evidence," though that too isn't technically correct.
> There is evidence, even if it isn't very good evidence.
> What's the "Best" evidence for intelligent life in the > galaxy? Well, we only have one model to go by -- the > Earth -- and that one model is teaming with life.
> Sorry, but when your only model points not only to life > but to intelligent life, that is "Evidence" for life... even if > you want to call it weak evidence.
> > And for every reason you can give why > > there SHOULD be intelligent life in our galaxy, I > > can give you TWO reasons that show that there isn't.
> Fine. Let's see your two reasons.
> > To me, this belief in alien civilizations is hardly > > more that a religion.
> Change that to "Alien visitors" and I'd agree with you.
HVAC can't prove he wasn't a rectal birth, or otherwise from an Alien pod.
> Why would I believe something for which there is > no proof?
Oh, please. You accept plenty of things without "Proof."
Very few people -- an insignificant percentage -- have ever seen "Proof" that their parents are really their biological parents, or that their siblings are actual blood relatives... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But that's something that is empirical. You could always do a dna test to be sure. What test do you recommend to find that alien civilization?
What I hope you mean (for the sake of accuracy) is "Evidence," though that too isn't technically correct.
There is evidence, even if it isn't very good evidence.
What's the "Best" evidence for intelligent life in the galaxy? Well, we only have one model to go by -- the Earth -- and that one model is teaming with life. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Exactly my point. We have evidence, or 'proof' if you like, that life exists on only ONE planet.
Are you now going to argue that *I* can't prove that there IS no life elsewhere?
> And for every reason you can give why > there SHOULD be intelligent life in our galaxy, I > can give you TWO reasons that show that there isn't.
Fine. Let's see your two reasons. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To be brief, here's something I said a week ago..........
OK So, where are they? Where are these advanced civilizations?
You'd think that a civilization say, 10,000 years ahead of us could manipulate a star. Where is that star? Where is ANY evidence of their handiwork? At one time Pulsars were given consideration as signposts or beacons in the universe but then our science caught up with our observations.
Then there's the fact that any object moving at 1/4 light speed or faster would put out HUGE amounts of x-rays as it interacts with interstellar hydrogen atoms.
Where are these x-rays?
> To me, this belief in alien civilizations is hardly > more that a religion.
Change that to "Alien visitors" and I'd agree with you. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"HVAC" <harlowcampb...@gmail.com> wrote: > "JTEM" <jte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Oh, please. You accept plenty of things without "Proof."
> Very few people -- an insignificant percentage -- have > ever seen "Proof" that their parents are really their > biological parents, or that their siblings are actual > blood relatives... > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> But that's something that is empirical.
No it isn't. There have been millions -- if not tens of millions -- who were adopted and had no idea until told... and even then they simply went by what they were told.
> You could always do a dna test to be sure.
And unless you actually have done so, you have no "Proof."
> What test do you recommend to find that alien civilization?
What test could utterly settle your parentage question, say, 150 years ago?
What about 350 years ago?
The point, of course, is that just because we have yet to achieve a level of technology that allows us to test for something does not mean that the something is false.
> What's the "Best" evidence for intelligent life in the > galaxy? Well, we only have one model to go by -- the > Earth -- and that one model is teaming with life. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Exactly my point.
I don't think that was your point.
> We have evidence, or 'proof' if > you like, that life exists on only ONE planet.
You're confused. "Evidence" and "Proof" are miles apart, but you're using the two interchangeably.
> Are you now going to argue that *I* can't prove > that there IS no life elsewhere?
If the only economic model that we had pointed to disastrous results for a federal policy, wouldn't you agree that it would constitute "Evidence" against the wisdom of the policy?
We have a model for life in the galaxy: The Earth. Anything opinion not formed using THAT model as a basis is pure speculation.
> OK So, where are they? Where are these advanced > civilizations?
On their planets, I imagine. Where else would they be?
> You'd think that a civilization say, 10,000 years ahead of > us could manipulate a star.
No I wouldn't. And why assume that they'd have to be 10,000 years ahead of us?
> Where is that star?
Where is a hypothetical star? That's easy: In a hypothetical solar system. Where else?
> Where is ANY evidence of their handiwork?
On their planets, I suppose.
Here's a WHOPPING HUGE flaw in your argument.
It "Disproves" us. We're not in any other solar systems. We're not 10,000 years ahead of ourselves. We don't manipulate stars.
>> Oh, please. You accept plenty of things without "Proof."
>> Very few people -- an insignificant percentage -- have >> ever seen "Proof" that their parents are really their >> biological parents, or that their siblings are actual >> blood relatives... >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> But that's something that is empirical.
> No it isn't. There have been millions -- if not tens of > millions -- who were adopted and had no idea until > told... and even then they simply went by what they > were told.
>> You could always do a dna test to be sure.
> And unless you actually have done so, you have no > "Proof."
>> What test do you recommend to find that alien civilization?
> What test could utterly settle your parentage question, > say, 150 years ago?
> What about 350 years ago?
> The point, of course, is that just because we have yet to > achieve a level of technology that allows us to test for > something does not mean that the something is false.
>> What's the "Best" evidence for intelligent life in the >> galaxy? Well, we only have one model to go by -- the >> Earth -- and that one model is teaming with life. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Exactly my point.
> I don't think that was your point.
>> We have evidence, or 'proof' if >> you like, that life exists on only ONE planet.
> You're confused. "Evidence" and "Proof" are miles > apart, but you're using the two interchangeably.
>> Are you now going to argue that *I* can't prove >> that there IS no life elsewhere?
> If the only economic model that we had pointed > to disastrous results for a federal policy, wouldn't > you agree that it would constitute "Evidence" > against the wisdom of the policy?
> We have a model for life in the galaxy: The Earth. > Anything opinion not formed using THAT model as > a basis is pure speculation.
>> OK So, where are they? Where are these advanced >> civilizations?
> On their planets, I imagine. Where else would they be?
>> You'd think that a civilization say, 10,000 years ahead of >> us could manipulate a star.
> No I wouldn't. And why assume that they'd have to be 10,000 > years ahead of us?
>> Where is that star?
> Where is a hypothetical star? That's easy: In a hypothetical > solar system. Where else?
>> Where is ANY evidence of their handiwork?
> On their planets, I suppose.
> Here's a WHOPPING HUGE flaw in your argument.
> It "Disproves" us. We're not in any other solar systems. > We're not 10,000 years ahead of ourselves. We don't > manipulate stars.
> So, by your very own "reasoning," we don't exist.
More precisely, humans "can't" exist. And yet, you Do exist. What a puzzle. Hmm?
-- **** Yubiwan of news:sci.electromagnetics Be well and come, be welcome. You are the fifth star!
|
